Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
critical_linguistic_concepts [2017/02/22 14:22] – created admincritical_linguistic_concepts [2020/08/10 12:38] – admin
Line 1: Line 1:
 =====Linguistic Concepts for Architectural Designing===== =====Linguistic Concepts for Architectural Designing=====
  
 +**Don't like reading?**\\
 +Here is a keynote speech that was delivered by Sabu Francis at a conference. It is about an hour long; but it would give a nice intro on the why of TAD . Even the what is also explained – as also the social context of architectural practice (especially in developing countries) https://youtu.be/b-7AkmA1xqM
 +
 +**You want another, longer version of this to read?**\\
 +If so, you are welcome to [[coreconcept|read this article]] instead of this one.
 +
 +**A brief idea of the core concepts**\\
 Currently architects leave only half the information in the form of drawings: What is present in drawings is known as **//poché//** in French. They are the dark marks we leave to delineate solid matter. Clear information on the spaces are largely absent. To "extract" spaces, a visual interpretation of the drawings is needed on the part of the collaborators of the project.  Currently architects leave only half the information in the form of drawings: What is present in drawings is known as **//poché//** in French. They are the dark marks we leave to delineate solid matter. Clear information on the spaces are largely absent. To "extract" spaces, a visual interpretation of the drawings is needed on the part of the collaborators of the project. 
  
Line 12: Line 19:
  
 My motivation for this different approach of BIM was simply this: //Architects can no longer remain in silos. The knowledge that we produce MUST be left behind for objective analysis and understanding by anyone concerned or affected//  My motivation for this different approach of BIM was simply this: //Architects can no longer remain in silos. The knowledge that we produce MUST be left behind for objective analysis and understanding by anyone concerned or affected// 
 +
 +Conventional BIM, that did not arise out of architectural theories, are still mired in controversies and interpretations. Hence data produced in those BIM are still prone to be kept in silos.
  
 Enough theory. Let me not make this a theoretical discussion. I have spoken about this elsewhere in detail. Enough theory. Let me not make this a theoretical discussion. I have spoken about this elsewhere in detail.
Press F1 inside the application to read context-sensitive help directly in the application itself
← ∈
Last modified: le 2023/04/22 20:59

Page Tools